 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINKS: EVOLUTION &
MISC.
(There are a lot more, of course.
But ... starting with these
an interested person would then
be able to find many others.)
The Talk.Origins Archive: Home Page http://www.talkorigins.org/Internet Infidels, Inc - Frank Zindler http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/frank_zindler/
Atheist United www.atheistsunited.org
Six 'Flood' Arguments Creationists Can't Answer http://ncseweb.org/cej/3/3/six-flood-arguments-creationists-cant-answer
Theory of Evolution vs. Creation Science http://www.religioustolerance.org/evolutio.htm
Smithsonian Institution - Main Web Page http://www.si.edu/
NASA Multimedia Gallery http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/index.html
SI Natural History Web: Research & Collections http://www.mnh.si.edu/rc/
-- MISCELLANEOUS -- The Scientific Method http://www.bscdesigner.com/articles/
Every teenager knows the power of "peer pressure" on behavior. Scientists know this as: "peer review" which directly affects research opportunities and grant placement. As they say in academia: "Publish or Perish". Stray too far from the current paradigm - and you don't get published, so you would then "perish" from academia.
Creationists and creation theory research receive virtually no grants to continue and enhance research. And yet - our theory continues to thrive - when science, using "The Scientific Method" prevails. It is tragic when careers, department chairs, and tenure cause science to become compromised.
As a young scientist, Albert Einstein, had to bend his research to the prevailing "Steady State Theory" of the day, about 100 years ago. He later called it his greatest blunder. (Had he NOT compromised back then, would we have ever heard of him later? "Publish or Perish" ... In other words, would financial needs have forced him to seek alternate employment, perhaps as a senior patent clerk somewhere...? Later forgotten.)
How many excellent scientists TODAY - are instead starving because they chose "The Scientific Method" over just believing in evolution, and then bending their research, compromising science itself...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|